Out-of-hours coaching guidance chat for academy coaches
Problem
Academy and youth sessions run in the evenings and at weekends, when the coach developer who owns safeguarding policy, age-appropriate guidelines and contact and load restrictions has gone home. A question comes up pitch-side: is this contact drill appropriate for this age group, does a returning player's load restriction still apply this week, does a new assistant coach hold the right qualification to run this session unsupervised. The policy document that would answer it sits in a folder nobody opens between sessions. The coach either guesses, sends a message into the club's group chat and waits, or runs the session as planned and asks afterwards, by which point the answer is only useful for next time.
Product idea
A chat and voice interface that answers only from documents the coach developer has uploaded: the safeguarding policy, age-appropriate training guidelines, qualification requirements and any current load or contact restrictions on individual players. It quotes the source document and the date it was last updated rather than issuing a verdict, because whether a specific drill is compliant is a judgment call the tool does not make. When a question falls outside what the documents cover, it logs the question and sends it to the coach developer as a structured request rather than leaving the coach to guess. The coach developer can see every question asked across the group, which surfaces where the written guidance is unclear or out of date.
Who it is for
Academy and assistant coaches running sessions without a coach developer present, and the coach developer who maintains the guidance documents and reviews the questions the tool could not answer.
Possible first version
A text-based chat interface loaded with guidance documents uploaded as PDF or plain text by the coach developer, answering with a quoted excerpt and source reference rather than a summary. Escalation is a structured email or message to the coach developer when no matching content exists, with a log of past questions the coach developer can review. Version one covers one club or academy's own documents only; it does not read player-specific load data from an athlete management system, and it never states that a session or drill is compliant.
- Build classification
- Workflow application
- Rough effort
- 3-5 week first release
- Roles involved
- Academy coach, Assistant coach, Coach developer
- Relevant to
- Academy & youth, Professional club, Collegiate athletics, Women's league
- Systems in play
- Playbook and document tools, Messaging apps, Athlete management systems
- Product framing
- Voice or chat interface
Questions we get asked
We already ask the coach developer these questions over WhatsApp when we can catch them. What does this add?
It adds an answer when you cannot catch them, which is most evenings. The group chat works when the coach developer happens to see the message; this works from the written guidance at any hour and says plainly when a question is not covered by that guidance, rather than sitting unread until morning. It does not replace the group chat, and any question it cannot answer still goes to a person.
Does it ever tell a coach that a drill is compliant?
No. It quotes what the guidance document says and when it was last updated, and leaves the judgment to the person qualified to make it. A tool that confidently signs off a contact drill for an under-13 session on a Tuesday evening is a liability rather than a convenience, so this deliberately stops short of a verdict and escalates anything that needs one.
What do we need to have ready before this could work?
The club's own current safeguarding policy, age-appropriate training guidelines, qualification requirements and any load or contact restriction documents, in a form that can be uploaded and searched, such as PDF or plain text. If those documents do not exist in written form yet, or are out of date, that is worth fixing before or during the build rather than after, since the tool can only answer from what it is given.
Who has to keep this up to date, and what does that cost them?
The coach developer owns the document library and reviews the escalation log, which is a small but ongoing task rather than a one-off setup. If nobody re-uploads the guidance when it changes, or nobody looks at the questions the tool could not answer, it drifts into giving confident answers from a stale document, which is worse than having no tool at all.
Is this your workflow?
Tell us one sports workflow that still runs on paper, spreadsheets, WhatsApp or an outdated system. We will map it and show you what a simpler product looks like.
Tell us about itMore in Coaching & training
- Clip request queue for coaches and performance analystsA shared request queue that replaces the messaging group coaches use to ask for training and match clips, tracking each request from ask to delivered link.
- Coach qualification and DBS expiry rostering checkA workflow that checks each coach's DBS and qualification expiry dates before a rota is published, blocking lapsed coaches from youth sessions and logging any override.
- Drill library submission and review queueA submission queue that routes new drills from coaches to the coach developer for review and tagging before they reach the shared library, replacing the photo folder and messaging group coaches use today.