SportsFirst

Crowd Management Software for Sports Venues

Internal dashboardWorkflow application4-6 week first releaseMonitor

Problem

Venue control rooms often receive headcounts from turnstiles, stewards, access systems or manual clickers without a unified operational view. The useful product is not just a count; it is a zone-level decision-support layer that compares current occupancy with configured thresholds, tracks trend direction and records what happened during the event.

Product idea

Build crowd management software for sports venues that shows occupancy and flow by zone, supports multiple counting inputs, compares live or periodically refreshed counts against configured thresholds, alerts named operators, logs acknowledgements and produces post-event analytics. Camera-based crowd estimation can be an optional later input rather than a requirement for the first release.

Where the AI agent does the work

The comparison against the certified limit is the piece worth automating. Instead of a control-room operator mentally checking a radioed headcount against the number on the safety certificate, the board does that comparison the moment a count is entered and raises the amber or red warning to a named operator. It also builds the timestamped record afterwards, showing when a zone was amber and who acknowledged it, which a local authority review asks for and which today exists only if someone happened to write it on a clipboard. The time saved is smallest during a quiet event and largest during a busy zone approaching capacity, exactly when a control room has no spare attention for arithmetic.

Who it is for

Stadium safety officers, heads of security, control-room operators, venue operations leaders and event managers.

Possible first version

Zone configuration, safe/operational thresholds entered by authorised staff, manual/file/API count inputs, occupancy dashboard, amber/red warnings, acknowledgement workflow, event timeline and post-event export. No automated capacity calculation and no camera analytics required for version one.

Roles involved
Safety officer, Head of security, Reception and front-of-house lead
Relevant to
Venue & stadium operator, Professional club, League office, Federation / governing body
Systems in play
Access control and door systems, Visitor management tools, Accreditation platforms

A proposal worked through in full

A different problem, taken all the way to architecture, standards and a phased delivery plan — the level of detail any idea here can be developed to.

Sports Fan Engagement Platform for Interactive Campaigns

Questions we get asked

What do we need on day one to make this useful?

The certified capacity figure and zone boundaries for each area named in the safety certificate, entered once by the safety officer, and a way to get a current count into the screen each round, typically a steward's clicker total or an export from the access control system. Nothing about the live feed needs to be automated before the first version proves whether staff actually look at the board and act on an amber warning.

Does this replace the access control system or the visitor book?

No. It reads a count from them and shows it against a limit; it does not manage doors, issue passes or replace sign-in records. Version one does not even read the access control system directly, it takes an exported or manually entered figure. Any future integration would sit alongside the existing systems, not instead of them.

Our stewards already radio headcounts to the control room. Why add a screen?

Because a radioed number written on a clipboard next to an exit tally is not compared against the certified limit by anyone in real time, and it disappears once the event ends. The board keeps the same radioed number but puts it against the threshold automatically and keeps a timestamped record of when a zone was amber or red, which is the evidence a local authority review asks for afterwards. If nobody would act differently on seeing amber, this will not help and should not be built.

What happens if the screen or the network goes down mid-event?

The control room falls back to whatever it does today: radioed counts and a clipboard. The board is a visibility layer on top of that process, not a replacement for it, so its failure does not remove anyone's ability to make a capacity decision. Version one has no offline mode of its own; it depends on someone being able to key in a number, which is also true of the manual process it is improving on.

Is this your workflow?

Tell us one sports workflow that still runs on paper, spreadsheets, WhatsApp or an outdated system. We will map it and show you what a simpler product looks like.

Tell us about it

More in Security, identity & accreditation